![]() They're cheap enough, that regular replacement and keeping a few spares on hand isn't much of a problem. Far more likely to fail are the trigger return spring and the trigger bar spring. The projected service life of the 92 is such that you will spend several times the original cost of the gun in ammo before you experience frame failure, or even current gen locking block failure. ![]() For $25 plus shipping, that's where I'd start. Wolff has lots of recoil spring options for the 92, including an extra power recoil calibration pack that has springs from 15 to 20 lbs. If you used some kind of flat springs, that may alleviate the binding issue. I think doubling up on the springs could easily slow the slide down to the point it doesn't cycle properly, and may bind up. The integral rail on the 92/96 A1 series strengthens the frame in much the same way as the angled dust cover did. Beretta went to the angled dust cover (more metal in the problem areas) to address the issue, and have added recoil buffers to the 92/96 A1 pistols. Even they tended go for around 10K rounds before cracks developed. ![]() Most of the frame cracking issues were related to the original 96 series guns, which were simply 92's with a. Compatible with 90 Series, PX4 Series and 8000 Series. £5.01 ) Type D lighter hammer spring to reduce trigger pulling force by 250g, suggested with standard non skeletonized hammer. The current generation of locking blocks last much longer the the first generation blocks. Lighter Hammer Spring for Beretta Pistols (Type D) 5 out of 5. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |